| Register
Saturday, February 04, 2012
Hawai’i court is asked to expedite Obama birth certificate appeal
Hawai’i court is asked to expedite Obama birth certificate appeal

 

ANDY MARTIN, J.D.

Post Office Box 1851

New York, NY 10150-1851

Toll-free tel. (866) 706-2639

Toll-free fax (866) 707-2639

Appellant pro se

 

 

 

 

IN THE

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI’I

ICA DOCKET NUMBER: 29643

 

ANDY MARTIN,                     

                            

Appellant,                  

                              

HON. LINDA LINGLE, in her   

official capacity as Governor;

DR. CHIYOME FUKINO, in her  

official capacity as Director    

of the Department of Health,

                            

Appellees.                  

                            

______________________________

 

 

MOTION TO EXPEDITE APPEAL

 

1. Although appellant is proceeding pro se and is not an expert in Hawai’i appellate procedure, he does have considerable experience with appellate tribunals.

The instant appeal poses an important question of national public policy and historical inquiry: should Hawai’i officials be required to make available for biographical research and scholarly inquiry the original, typewritten 1961 birth certificate of President Barack Obama?

2. Appellant has written one book on Barack Obama, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, which is (or should be) part of the record on appeal, has conducted extensive original research in Hawai’i and is preparing to author a second book on the president. Appellant in sponsoring a national conference on missing records involving the president, www.NationalConferenceonObama.blogspot.com.

3. With all due respect to the district Judge, it is difficult to see how a basic historical record, the original “ribbon” copy of the birth certificate of the President of the United States, can or should be concealed from scholarly inquiry or the American people.

4. Appellant has been in contact with the Hawai’i Attorney General and that office opposes expediting this appeal, see attached.

5. Because there is a time lag between filing in this Court and Appellant receiving Notice, he does not know if the record on appeal has been filed yet. In any event, the record is due to be filed or has been filed.

6. This appeal represents review of a straightforward question of law. There was a single hearing in the district court; on information and belief there were and are no disputed questions of fact.

CONCLUSION

Most respectfully, Appellant asks this Court consider the historical significance of this litigation, and to enter an order setting an expedited briefing and argument schedule.

Respectfully submitted,

 

ANDY MARTIN

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

I certify I have served opposing counsel as follows:

 

Jill T. Nagamine, Esq.,

Deputy Attorney General

425 Queen Street

Honolulu, HI 96813

via Fax (808) 587-3077

 

on March 28, 2009.

 

ANDY MARTIN


Posted on Saturday, March 28, 2009 (Archive on Saturday, April 04, 2009)
Posted by admin  Contributed by admin
Return

(c) Entire site and contents copyright by Andy Martin   |  Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use